Archivist
Nguyen Anh Tuan
HCM City
Singapore


With thanks to:
The Economist
Time Asia
The New York Times
BBC News
Yale Global Online
American Heritage
Foreign Affairs
Military History
Mother Jones
National Geographic
The New Republic
Project Syndicate
Japan Times
Heritage Foundation
Amnesty International
Human Rights Watch
Far Eastern Economic Review
Rethinking Schools Online
Europa World
International Herald Tribune
History Today
Wikipedia
Newsweek
The Korea Times



Friends
friend
friend
friend
friend



Tagboard
your tagboard code here


Archives September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 February 2008 March 2008 May 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 January 2009 March 2009 April 2009 September 2009 October 2009 March 2010 March 2011 April 2011 September 2012

Credits
Acoustict.blogspot.com
Picture
Brushes
Blogspot
Blogskins

Friday 19 October 2007
black or white


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket


there's semantic distinction between a nation state and a state nation. the basic idea is that a nation state tends toward homogeneity, whereas a state nation could accept, or tolerate, heterogeneity. and so in my democracy class, the professor asked, out of curiosity, about the state of a multi-racial Singapore (maybe because he's South African).

anyway, this clever Malay (do not be surprised) boy said that Singapore's not honest about racial harmony; racism exists, albeit illicit, but the government does not wish to promote honest discussion on this. he made sense. it's a socially embedded subconscious: jokes, beliefs that Chinese are "hard-working" and "intelligent" and Malay "happy-go-lucky" and "lazy".

and a Chinese "government" boy responded that it's about racial tolerance; racism might admittedly exist, but as long as people tolerate racial differences and practices Singapore's good to go. a classic case of community before self!

how come it seems like the Indian people are entirely missed out... oh well, never mind. if you get what i mean.

and yeah, i'm thrilled that, coincidentally, Nobel laureate James Watson went as far as claiming that black people are not as intelligent as white people (and therefore, western social programmes just don't work in Africa). this is seriously politically incorrect. and i kind of like that.

of course, Singapore's not the only place that's not totally honest about it. British intellectuals and policy-advisors slammed his remark bad. and the London's Science Museum cancelled a scheduled talk by Watson. well, very few things are badder taboos than racism exposed. one's same-sex marriage.

affirmative action through the camera lenses of Bruce Almighty and Evan Almighty! "But suppose God is black? What if we go to Heaven and we, all our lives, have treated the Negro as an inferior, and God is there, and we look up and He is not white? What then is our response?" - Robert F. Kennedy
update: Dr. Watson has just "unreservedly" apologised for his inferred remark on whites' superior intelligence to blacks on Oct 20, 2007.

Tuan ♥ 6:09 pm link to post 0 comments